Rather than concentrating of what leaders are, as the traditional
trait approach urges, today's behavioral approach has enabled
us to look at what people do.
Personality traits and leadership traits are difficult
to measure. How can we measure traits such as honesty, integrity,
loyalty, or diligence? To measure traits, researchers relied on
constructs which lacked reliability and, given differing
definitions, also lacked validity. Today, researchers have
turned to an examination of leader behaviors. With behaviors,
researchers could rely on empirical evidence. Behaviors, contrary to
traits, can be observed, assessed and measured.
Behavior = A person's actions -which are controlled
by the sum of their thinking, beliefs and feelings about specific ideas, situations, or other
people. The three primary types of organizational behavior are:
Leadership Behavior, InterGroup Behavior and Political Behavior.
All learning leads to nothing when people don’t change their thoughts
and actions (read: behavior). 21st Century, professional coaching is an
integrative approach founded on the behavioral sciences. Today, a
coaching model must encapsulate personal development, beliefs, values,
attitudes, emotions, motivation levels and adult and social learning, as
well as personal and organizational dynamics and defenses.
Principles of behavior based coaching ('behavior' derived from the
term 'behavioral' sciences and not the limiting theory of behaviorism or
behavioral psychology) have developed over recent years from the fields
of evidence based psychology and validated and proven organizational
change principles (See: 'Behavioral Coaching' by Zeus and Skiffington).
Variables
in Behavior Change
Thoughts and ideas inside a person’s mind have significant influence
on an individual’s behaviors. These variables interact with
social and environmental factors and it is the synergy among all these
influences that operate on behavior.
Elements affecting Behavior
-Knowledge: Facts, truth, or
principles gained by sight, experience, or report.
-Skills : The ability to do
something well, arising from talent, training/coaching, or practice.
-Belief : Acceptance of or
confidence in an alleged fact or body of facts as true or right without
positive knowledge or proof; a perceived
truth. Previous experiences and mood impact our beliefs because they are
based partly on emotion.
-Attitude: Manner, disposition,
feeling, or position toward a person or thing.
-Values: Ideas, ideals, customs that
arouse an emotional response for or against them
Coaching at Work: Generally the reasons for
seeking out a coach are linked to the desire for change at one or more
of three levels. For example, there may be issues around:
- Intrapersonal skills– e.g. a desire to become more effective
at time-management
- Interpersonal skills– e.g. a desire to develop more productive
relationships with fellow workers
- Organizational skills– e.g. a need to develop a more strategic
approach to organizational policy
By positively changing an individual's behavior at any one of the
above levels the organization as a whole will benefit as the
individual increases his or her effectiveness.
Behaviors
are learned and can be "unlearned"-
Behavior is not a person's innate Personality:
-The
temptation to attribute the cause of performance problems solely to
personal style
and individual motivation issues.
It is vital that today's leaders/managers understand the
difference between trying to change someone’s personality and trying
to change someone’s behavior. Unfortunately, most managers make no
distinction. Leaders/managers typically believe that the
root cause of most employees’ performance problems is related to who
they are (their personality) rather than what they do
(their behavior.) They often communicate a belief -often indirectly
and unintentionally -that performance problems are related to personality
issues. A
common
solution is to
encourage the employee to change themselves through some
personality type profiling change program. This not only doesn’t
work but communicates blame to the employee's personality.
Defining
Behavior = Better Performance:
Behavior-based coaching provides a better, proven
framework for looking at the root causes of behavior, one that starts
with a clear definition of behavior. The
ability to describe behavior (personal
skills) in
objective, observable terms is an important performance tool for
leaders/managers. Describing behavior in observable terms helps managers
to balance their focus on process and outcomes. Leaders/managers also
need to understand the effects of their behavior on themselves
and others.
Describing behavior makes
finding a solution easier whereas focusing on personality issues
invariably makes the task very difficult:
By objectively discussing behavior, leaders/managers also
keep work-related discussions in a constructive problem-solving mode
that is less likely to make employees defensive. Objectively
discussing behavioral concerns is so much easier than trying to
change an employee’s personality or motivation. Furthermore,
discussing objective behavior makes effective communication easier.
When discussing internal attributes, such as personality, different
people have different interpretations of the terms being used.
Objectively describing behavior helps keep everyone on the same page
and lowers the risk of miscommunication.
For example; a senior manager of a
large firm, for years had received critical
descriptions of himself as a controlling micromanager. In the
past, he wasn't really shown how to address the problem because words
such as controlling made statements to him about his
personality. Recently however, he begun working with a coach who
took a behavior-based approach about helping him change his actions
rather than his so-called personality. As such, he was provided the requisite
behavioral tools to help change his thinking and verbal behavior.
Within a short time, the entire organizational environment around him
changed. People felt they could actually do their jobs without getting
approval for every single move and…more things were getting done.
The change in his behavior had changed his life for the
better and that of everyone around him.
The Need for Behavioral based Coaching:
-Traditional deployment of outdated coaching skills training
initiatives fail to produce sustainable change in behaviors.
Today's organizational goal is to utilize a
professional development change program that changes behaviors and
enhances performance so that business objectives are achieved. Many
coaches are failing this challenge to positively impact an
employee's individual perceptions, self awareness and relationship
management, and ways of approaching people, problems and situations
differently than in the past.
Behavioral competencies:
Too often in organizations people are hired or promoted for
their technical expertise and fail because of their behavioral
competencies. Behavioral competencies are not innate talents, but
learned abilities, each of which has a unique contribution to making
leaders more resilient, and therefore more effective. Behavioral
competencies control the leader's/manager's ability to perform, get
along with others, adapt to changing situations, and other issues.
The difference
between technical and behavioral competencies:
Technical competencies are usually learned (in an educational
environment or on the job) whereas behavioral competencies
(self-awareness, self-management and work habits and values) are
typically learned through life experiences. Behavioral
competencies are the processes or control laws that use the
technical competencies to achieve and/or maintain goals.
Traditional business coaching fails to deliver:
Traditional coaching, built around Effective Listening
Skills, Questioning and Goal Setting etc, falls well short of
developing behavioral competencies. Coachees are given feedback
about how to do it better, what to change, what the standard is for
high performance etc. However, this "one size fits all", simplistic approach
to developing competencies is ineffective as it ignores our
individual complexities.
In traditional coaching
the participants shortly revert to habitual patterns at the
conclusion of the coaching cycle. It's an expensive venture for a
short-term "buzz." Thus, the challenge for coaching
professionals is to enhance organizational effectiveness with a
behavioral change and learning model that strengthens and sustains
individuals in their behavioral competencies.
The rapid acquisition of lasting personal skills and learning
acquisition is an essential challenge facing all organizations.
Training alone cannot ensure competence. It simply comes down to changing
a person's behavioral patterns—what people do and don’t do to make the
acquisition of each new skill a reality.